• digitarald
    overholt: nah, you can't sound accusatory
  • smaug
    hsivonen: jessica: ping
  • jessica
    smaug: pong
  • smaug
    jessica: I think I need hsivonen here too :)
  • smaug
    jessica: let me write an email. Perhaps hsivonen can explain if I'm wrong here with my concerns
  • jessica
    smaug: sure, I'll leaving the office soon, can take a another look later tonight.
  • smaug
  • smaug
    padenot: do you happen to know if there is some simple web audio based metronome example somewhere?
  • padenot
    smaug, surely it exists, otherwise I can make you one
  • smaug
  • farre
    anyone got experience with how the pgo profile is generated?
  • farre
    or more specifically, the firefox runner gets budget throttled when gathering the pgo profile
  • smaug
    or I'm not sure if that metronome is very accurate
  • asuth
  • firebot
    Bug 1359677 — NEW, ttung⊙mozilla.com — Implement a new internal platform API for "bypass for network"
  • catalinb
    overholt: 1on1?
  • overholt
    catalinb: I can't right now. in an hour ok for you?
  • catalinb
    overholt: yes
  • overholt
    catalinb: cool. talk to you then
  • farre
    bkelly: you there?
  • bkelly
    farre: yes
  • farre
    just thought I'd pick your brain
  • bkelly
    farre: give me 10 minutes? I need to get coffee still
  • farre
    sure
  • farre
    I'll fill up as well :)
  • bkelly
    farre: I'm back
  • farre
    bkelly: It's about Bug 1407207. generating pgo profile got a lot slower after budget throttling.
  • firebot
    bugzil.la/1407207 — NEW, afarre⊙mozilla.com — 9.15 - 9.81% build times (windows2012-32, windows2012-64) regression on push dbcd58f04e4fc7d5172fff
  • farre
    bkelly: after thinking about it it doesn't come as a surprise, since I imagine gathering the pgo profile actually runs slower than release
  • bkelly
    farre: I would recommend just disabling it during pgo profile generation
  • farre
    bkelly: right
  • farre
    bkelly: and really for debug as well
  • bkelly
    farre: well, if we can leave it on for debug we should...
  • farre
    bkelly: so I haven't heard any complaints yet, and we always have the possibility of tuning regeneration and max values
  • farre
    but, yea. pgo was really my main concern
  • bz
    Oh, for crying out loud
  • » bz wonders how many custom element tests are broken like this
  • annevk
    bz: Chrome and Safari embraced the same bug?
  • bz
    annevk: hmm?
  • annevk
    bz: they collaborated on custom element tests
  • bz
    annevk: ah
  • bz
    annevk: It was a typo in the test; fixed upstream as of 5 days ago...
  • bz
    annevk: now if only we could do a wpt merge...
  • » bz spent some time today looking into how to do it and has not succeeded in figuring it out yet
  • bz
    I mean, short of manually doing the merge
  • bz
    But jgraham has scripts for this and I was hoping to actually use them...
  • annevk
    jgraham's back next week I heard
  • bz
    OK
  • bz
    Realistically, having this blocked on jgraham is silly
  • bz
    If the scripts are in-tree, we should have docs on how to use them too
  • » bz mailed dburns about this a few hours ago
  • annevk
    Yeah, furthermore, Chrome has it automated...
  • bz
    mmm
  • jdm
    there is automatic syncing being worked on by people in #wptsync
  • jdm
    nevermind, it has a different name that I forget
  • bz
    good, good
  • jgraham
    bz: Yeah, making the imports not suck or blovk on me is a thing that's happening. We are at the "have prototype, but it probably doesn't actually work in real life" stage
  • jgraham
    Should be done by the end of the year
  • jgraham
    I'll start another import on Monday though
  • jdm
    jgraham: how does upstream sync work for gecko now that waiting for travis-ci results is mandatory?
  • jdm
    I'm having trouble with servo's script because of that
  • jgraham
    jdm: It works by me having admin access
  • jgraham
    So we don't have to wait for travis
  • jdm
    delightful scalable solutions
  • jgraham
    Indeed :)
  • jgraham
    The thing where the bot marks the patch as reviewed would be better indeed
  • jgraham
    I could try asking tobie on irc
  • jgraham
    If your GH issue didn't work
  • jdm
    I got my bot access for marking PRs reviewed
  • jdm
    not sure if anything can be done about travis, though
  • bz
    jgraham: Awesome, on both counts
  • bz
    jgraham: Also, aren't you on leave? ;)
  • jgraham
    jdm: Oh, right
  • jgraham
    jdm: I can make you an admin?
  • jdm
    that would be a big help
  • jgraham
    jdm: Try now
  • » jgraham vanishes again (well maybe)
  • tobie
    jdm|busy, jgraham: you all need something from me or are you ok?
  • jdm|busy
    tobie: we're ok, thanks
  • tobie
    jdm: cool. (I couldn't really make it out from the above conversation.)